Forthcoming Issues

Special Issue no. 30

Reinventing Mao. Maoisms and National Cinemas 

Edited by Marco Dalla Gassa, Corrado Neri and Federico Zecca

Deadline for abstract proposal: July 3, 2017 Extended deadline: July 16, 2017

The charismatic and controversial figure of Mao Zedong has not only left a deep mark on the history of twentieth-century China – looming over the country’s new capitalist developments, as a sort of ghost – but he has also remarkably spread beyond national borders and into completely different political and social contexts. In particular, after the start of the Cultural Revolution (1966), several groups inspired by Chinese Marxism-Leninism appeared worldwide. From the United States to India, from New Zealand to Peru, from Indonesia to Japan and within the main European countries, specific political ideals, revolutionary propositions, fantasies and images of purity, as well as a Third World perspective have been projected onto the figure of Mao, to some extent giving way to a form of idolatry – so called maolâtrie. More generally, at a trans-national level, Maoism has stood an umbrella term for different desires and intellectual and affective investments, according to their own cultural and geo-political contexts. As a cultural phenomenon, in fact, Maoism represents the ideal place where everyone has been able to invest what they wanted. In other words, each country has developed and, so to speak, re-invented “its own” Maoism with specific characteristics, often completely different from the Chinese original.

Starting from these premises, this special issue of Cinéma & Cie aims to investigate the relationship between national cinemas and trans-national Maoism(s), with a particular focus on the ways in which cinema and its (critical, theoretical, social) discourses have contributed to re-writing (and re-inscribing) Chinese Maoism within different national cultures. In order to reach this goal, this special issue asks scholars to pay less attention to the more ideological and militant aspects of the relation between cinema and Maoism (already widely studied in the past) and to focus instead on more up-to-date theoretical approaches and methodologies, taking into account: audience reception practices (for instance, the impact of given films in specific social and cultural contexts); film critic and cinephilia (also in activist, not only film, magazines); the iconographic relevance of specific images (for instance, the successful circulation of the figure of Mao within the collective imagination at an international level); the penetration of Maoist watchwords within specific film practices including both genre and auteur, as well as the avant-garde. We invite contributions (both case studies and theoretical reflections) on:


  • The impact of Maoist thought on film and visual art theories.
  • The relation between Maoism and other theoretical fascinations of the time: structuralism, psychoanalysis, and semiology.
  • Film philosophy meets Maoism: Badiou, Rancière, Žižek, Foucault, and others.
  • European cinematic Maoism as orientalist discourse. Post-colonial approaches.
  • Pan-Asian Maoism: reception, resistance, and memory.
  • Anti-Maoism in Taiwan and Hong Kong: representations and (counter-)theories.


  • Maoist films as historical documents: factories, communes, students’ protests, strikes.
  • Maoism, cinephilia, and cinephobia. The relationship between Maoist thought and images.
  • Militant magazines and their understanding of cinema and the visual arts.
  • Cahiers du cinéma, Cinéthique, Ombre rosse and other magazines (both Western and Asian, official and underground): critical reception of Maoism and its relation with political activism.
  • New Japanese Cinema: Wakamatsu, Oshima (and their “brothers”) and revolutionary cinema.
  • Asian revolutions’ agitprop: newsreels and feature-length films, theories, and practices in Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos, and North Korea.


  • Maoism in militant cinema of the 1960s and 1970s.
  • Echoes of Maoism in popular and genre cinema.
  • Concepts and practices of Authorship as opposed to the de-subjectivation practices encouraged by the Cultural Revolution.
  • Survivals and reincarnations of Maoism in contemporary cinema.
  • Representation of Mao and the Cultural Revolution in cinema, television, documentary, and international media.
  • The missing image: the ban of Maoist images and discourses in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and so on: propaganda, counter-propaganda, anti-communism.

Submission details

Contributors are asked to submit an abstract (300-500 words, 5 keywords, and 5 bibliographical references) and a short biographical note (150 words) to,, and by July 3, 2017.

All notifications of acceptance will be sent no later than July 10, 2017.

If accepted, 4,000 word essays will then be required by October 30, 2017, after which they will be submitted to peer review.

Schermata 2015-04-17 alle 11.07.38
Download pdf Call for Essays No. 30 (English)

Schermata 2015-04-17 alle 11.07.38
Download pdf Call for Essays No. 30 (Français)


Special Issue no. 29

Re-intermediation: Distribution, Online Access, and Gatekeeping in the Digital European Market 

Edited by Stefano Baschiera, Francesco Di Chiara and Valentina Re

Deadline for abstract proposal: March 10, 2017

This special issue seeks to examine the on-going transformation in the gatekeeping systems regulating the digital distribution of audiovisual content in the European context.

The past decade has witnessed a weakening of the role of traditional intermediaries in the screen industries such as distributors, exhibitors and broadcasters. This is due to a series of phenomena affecting the traditional patterns of film distribution and consumption, such as the shrinking of the theatrical window; the crisis of home video physical formats; the evolution of online streaming, especially after the arrival on the European territory of OTT behemoths like Netflix and Amazon Prime Video (Cunningham and Silver 2013); and finally the dissemination of informal services such as P2P portals and linking sites/cyberlockers.

Many of the early contributions to this field of research underline the disruptive role of these factors in what has been defined as a welcome process of disintermediation (Iordanova and Cunningham 2012; Jenkins, Ford and Green 2013). However, an excessive emphasis on the supposed disappearance of intermediaries could lead to a rhetoric of unconditioned, limitless and ubiquitous content access, and of the democratization of audiovisual culture in the digital age.

On the contrary, this special issue draws on the assumption that, rather than disappearing, intermediaries are instead changing shape through a process of re-intermediation involving a negotiation between several subjects, all interested in maintaining control over content access (Gubbins 2014; Tryon 2013; Crisp 2015; Vonderau 2015). Therefore, the current digital scenario is characterized by the emergence of new forms of intermediation, which include legal battles over licensing and distribution rights, film festival networks as additional distribution circuits, the interface design of digital archives and catalogues, the role of content aggregators, the online positioning of public-service broadcasters facing digital competition, and the “social distribution” made by online communities.

In fact, this process of re-intermediation also concerns informal distribution platforms (e.g. P2P portals and linking sites connected to cyberlockers), which feature new forms of gatekeeping through their own strategies, goals and the constant interaction with formal distribution and its main players (Lobato and Thomas 2015).

The need for an understanding of the main transformations in gatekeeping mechanisms is also important in the field of supranational policymaking. We refer, for instance, to the heated debate surrounding the European Digital Single Market strategy, in which the removal of geoblocking mechanisms (Lobato and Meese 2016) and the possible abolition of exclusive territorial licensing (Cabrera Blázquez, Cappello, Grece and Valais 2016), elicited different responses in a variety of stakeholders, including European producers and distributors, European public-services and commercial broadcasters, global OTT giants or smaller European VOD services, and consumer organisations.

Finally, considering online distribution simultaneously as an opportunity, a challenge, and a threat, also affects the policies and practices of audiovisual archives, which are increasingly compelled to regulating online direct access, for both professionals and non-professional users (such as scholars and students), to their catalogues.

Based on this general theoretical framework, the special issue aims to focus in particular (but not exclusively) on the following topics:

  • Interactions between formal and informal services and practices;
  • Tradition and innovation of the business models in the audiovisual sector;
  • Legal issues (copyright holders’ rights and consumers’ rights) in the audiovisual sector;
  • The relationships between policymakers (i.e. the EU) and the audiovisual industry with respect to online distribution and the access to audiovisual products;
  • Strategies of control and curatorial styles in VOD platforms and especially SVOD platforms;
  • Strategies of control and customization of the viewing experience;
  • The organization of on demand catalogues, and its role in shaping the access to audiovisual products and the visibility of content;
  • Interactions between distribution platforms and social media;
  • “Piracy” and “social distribution”;
  • Strategies of control and curatorial styles in unauthorized VOD platforms like P2P portals and linking sites;
  • The organization of catalogues and the visibility of content on unauthorized VOD platforms;
  • Day and date releases and other attempts to re-shape the traditional window system;
  • Ongoing processes of re-definition of the audiovisual sector (production, circulation, consumption), with particular reference to phenomena of hybridization between cinema and television;
  • Synergies and competition between SVOD services and pay TVs;
  • The main features and gatekeeping functions of “catch-up TVs”, with particular reference to public and commercial broadcasting services;
  • Synergies and cross-promotion strategies between traditional film festival and online distribution;
  • The role of film festivals and Awards in the organizing strategies and curatorial approach of VOD catalogues;
  • The main features and gatekeeping functions of online film festivals;
  • The main features and gatekeeping functions of digital, online audiovisual archives;
  • Forms, strategies and difficulties faced by traditional film archives when moving online;
  • Strategies of control and curatorial styles in the online platforms of audiovisual archives;
  • The organization of the cataloguing of online archive platforms, and its role in shaping access to audiovisual products and the visibility of content;
  • Personalization strategies and interactions with social media in online archive platforms.

Selected bibliography

Cabrera Blázquez F. J., Cappello M., Grece C., Valais S., “Territoriality and its impact on the financing of audiovisual works”, Iris Plus, 2, 2015.

Crisp V., Film Distribution in the Digital Age, Palgrave Macmillan 2015.

Crisp V., Menotti Gonring G. (eds), Besides the Screen, Palgrave Macmillan 2015.

Cunningham S., Silver J., Screen Distribution and the New King Kongs of the Online World, Palgrave 2013.

Curtin M., Holt J., Sanson K. (eds), Distribution Revolution: Conversations about the Digital Future of Film and Television, University of California Press 2014.

Dixon W. W., Streaming: Movies, Media and Instant Access, University Press of Kentucky 2014.

Gubbins M., Audience in the Mind, CineRegio 2014.

Havens T., “Towards a Structuration Theory of Media Intermediaries”, in Making Media Work. Cultures of Management in the Entertainment Industries, ed. by Derek Johnson, Derek Kompare and Avi Santo, London-New York, New York University Press 2014

Holt J., Sanson K. (eds), Connected Viewing, Routledge 2014.

Iordanova D., Cunningham S. (eds), Digital Disruption: Cinema Moves On-line, St Andrews 2012.

Jenkins H., Ford S., Green J., Spreadable Media, New York University Press 2013.

Lobato R., “The politics of digital distribution: Exclusionary structures in online cinema”, Studies in Australasian Cinema, 3:2, 2009.

Lobato R., Shadow Economies of Cinema, BFI/Palgrave 2012.

Lobato R., Thomas J., The Informal Media Economy, Polity 2015.

Lobato R., Meese J. (eds), Geoblocking and Global Video Culture, Institute of Network Cultures 2016.

McDonald, K. P., “Digital dreams in a material world: the rise of Netflix and its impact on changing distribution and exhibition patterns”, Jumpcut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 55, 2013.

Perren A., “Rethinking distribution for the future of media industry studies”, Cinema Journal, 52:3, 2013.

The Velvet Light Trap, special issue “Media Distribution”, 75:1, 2015.

Tryon C., On-demand Culture, Rutgers University Press 2013.

Vonderau P., “The Politics of Content Aggregators”, Television and New Media, 16:8, 2015.

Submission details

Contributors are asked to send an abstract in English or French (300-500 words, 5 keywords, and 5 bibliographical references) and a short biographical note (150 words) to: by March 10, 2017.

All notifications of acceptance will be sent no later than April 1, 2017.

If accepted, 4,000 word essays will then be required for peer review by July 31, 2017.

Schermata 2015-04-17 alle 11.07.38
Download Call for Essays No. 29 (pdf)

%d bloggers like this: